>>> Click here for the RMC FAQ'N RULES <<<

January 17, 2006

THE MAN IN THE GRAY FLANNEL SUIT

The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit DVD

Your January 2006 RMC II Results Are In!

TAGLINE: The Motion Picture That May Very Well Be THE VERY GREATEST!

The Preshow Entertainment was POLICE SQUAD! This was the short lived TV show by the Zucker brothers (post-AIRPLANE!, pre-POLICE SQUAD! movies). They made and ran 6 of them in 1982, and then they were gone. Rumors abounded, but the general consensus was the network hated them. And I believe that. For POLICE SQUAD! was one of the funniest series on television.

Earlier this year, the movie POLICE SQUAD 33 1/3: THE FINAL INSULT came up in RMC. That was made 12 years after the show was yanked. And it was the third of three movies. I believe they all did well. So, there you go, networks at their best. But it's easy to be a couch critic. It wasn't my network. But it should have been.

Anyway, as you must surely know, POLICE SQUAD! followed in the tradition of AIRPLANE!, but this time poking funny at the noir/DRAGNET amalgam. That's perfect for deadpan Leslie Nielson's narration. Lots of running gags, like the week's guest star being announced and killed during the opening titles, and the shoeshine boy giving the police tips for some scratch, followed by a celebrity (we saw Dr. Joyce Brothers) who paid for tips regarding their careers. And the freeze frame in the Quinn Martinish epilogue, which was simply the actors keeping still while something would always be moving behind them. And whenever Nielson as Lt. Frank Drebin pulled his car up, he'd knock over the only garbage cans in the street (the number of cans was also the episode number).

Now go out and see them! Oh? You can't? They're not available?

The running time of the movie selected was over 2:20, so we had the option to veto it, due to RMC's 220 Rule. But since it was just the two of us, we opted to watch it, thinking we'd have to watch it another time as an RMC double feature anyway.

THE MAN IN THE GRAY FLANNEL SUIT is about a man, maybe Cary Grant, who invented a suit that made him invisible. At least that's what I thought it was about. Have I been more wrong in my life? Well, yeah, but still.... In his second appearance at RMC (THE BOYS FROM BRAZIL was his first), Gregory Peck, the man with the coolest speaking voice in film, stars as Tom Rath, a man with secrets he doesn't even know about. A man who despite the curve balls of life, just wants to do the right thing. How Peckian.

Rath's problems are aplenty: commuting to NYC from Connecticut, a wife who wants him to make more money, a kid with chicken pox, a dead end job, a new job offer that makes him an office-political victim, an inherited house that may not be legally his, and...a child he had with an Italian girl while in the war 10 years earlier. But here's the funny thing- I never got a sense of "frantic." It's such a low-key performance that I didn't even realize there were all these conflicts until I wrote them down just now. Not saying that as a bad thing (Michael Douglas would have played it over the top, no?). It's actually an interesting choice. But it only works for so far.

I thought TMITGFS a strange movie. Almost dreamlike at times. The war flashback was maybe 30 minutes (featuring the film's best scene; a dead soldier that Rath is in denial over), then back to the present day, where it doesn't get mentioned for perhaps another hour. But I suppose because of that, there is that niggling that it will return to take a chunk out of him. People love this movie, but I did not. I didn't hate it, either. It was right there on the tightrope. I liked its subtleties and performances, yet was thrown by its structure and meandering. Thrown, but not tripped up. TMITGFS was written and directed by Nunnally Johnson, who did TAKE HER SHE'S MINE (a 2005 RMC pick), and boasts a score by Bernard Herrmann. Also of mucho importance, DeForest Kelley in a small role, actually saying the line, "This man's dead, Captain!"

I think I'd like to see this movie again in a few years. It left me with an uneasy feeling. Maybe that was the point. Or maybe I just think I'll see Gregory Peck put a suit on and turn invisible.


Tags: , , ,

January 01, 2006

THE TERMINATOR

The TerminatorYOUR JANUARY 2006 RMC RESULTS ARE IN!

Tagline: The thing that won't die, in the nightmare that won't end.

The movie we watched is now 22 years old. The lead character was a murderer who was supposed to be played by O.J. Simpson. Know it yet? Okay, how about now: "I'll be back!"

Yes, RMC kicks 2006 in with THE TERMINATOR. A low budget, raw, and at times charming movie that spawned so many copycats I wish I could go back in time and kill some studio decisions. Even the sequels (although T2 sounded amazing) were knockoffs. THE TERMINATOR, a tightrope walk between pleasing sci-fi and bombast, is arguably the only real satisfying entry in the genre, which is ironic since it wasn't original (the lawsuit with writer Harlan Ellison was settled out of court).

Sure, people remember The Catch Phrase and Termy's demeanor, but when you get under the fake skin and break it down, T1 is really a pretty smart movie. It's Man vs. Machine in a really fake, low budget future. For the Machines to win, they send back a killer robot to kill Sarah Connor, who will mother a child named John, who in turn will grow up and one day lead The Resistance against the Machines. With her dead, no John, and the Machines win. So Man sends a man back in time (apparently, 23 years from now, in 2029, we'll be able to time travel) to stop The Terminator so John can be born. The story holds up nicely, but the action sequences have been done to death so many times since, they don't fare as well. Yet the movie manages to give you the feeling that the studio had no part in the creative process, and let them just make their little movie. Here's $6 mil, Jimmy, go out and play. I just read that James Cameron had the image of the metallic skeleton killer robot first, and worked backwards from there. And because of budget constrictions (he couldn't have a future that looked all that good, in the movie, not in real life), so he made it a time travel story so he can shoot in present day. Pretty cool, if it's true. I wonder if that happened to him with TITANIC?

So like I said, some of the movie doesn't kick the way it did in 1984. For that matter, what does? David Lee Roth? Anyway, the good far outweighs the bad, and if you haven't seen it in decades, you should watch it again.

Tags: , ,








Feed Burner Subscribe in a reader



Powered byFeedBlitz


About ...

RMC email address
Old RMC Men

RMC is not affiliated with Rochester Midland Corporation, makers of fine restroom disinfecting fluids and urinal mats since 1888.

Archives

Powered by Pizza, Red Vines,
& 6 Different Kinds of Soda

RMC MASCOT

RMC HERO

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Random Movie Club. Make your own badge here.


((( Contribute to our Popcorn Fund! )))




Best Viewed With Firefox 2



Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to Technorati Favorites!


Blimp!
eXTReMe Tracker